B2 News Sports · May 25, 2026

The Enhanced Games, or ‘steroid Olympics’, are on. They pose risks for athletes and those watching

The 'steroid Olympics' have launched in Las Vegas, dividing the sports world over drugs and fair play.

Reading level

Switch if this feels too hard or too easy.

The Enhanced Games — nicknamed the 'steroid Olympics' — have officially launched in Las Vegas. Forty-two athletes compete in swimming, sprinting, weightlifting, and strongman events, all with one remarkable difference from traditional sport: performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) are not only allowed, they're part of the deal. Athletes can use FDA-approved substances like testosterone and human growth hormone under medical supervision, and they can pocket a $1 million bounty for breaking a world record. The International Olympic Committee has condemned the event as an attack on fair play.

The founder, Australian tech entrepreneur Aron D'Souza, has built a handful of core arguments to legitimize the games. He claims clean sport is largely a myth, pointing to research suggesting over 40% of elite athletes already use PEDs. In a third argument intended to discredit anti-doping, D'Souza claims athletes in 'regular' sports use PEDs under the guise of Therapeutic Use Exemptions — though researchers point out that fewer than 1% of Olympic athletes actually hold valid exemptions.

D'Souza also argues the event will reduce the stigma around PED use. While this is positive from a harm reduction perspective, it might also increase the numbers of people who use them — a risk researchers flag as deeply concerning. Meanwhile, the bodily autonomy argument has real cracks: athletes follow strict drug protocols dictating exactly what they can take and when.

The Enhanced Games have powerful financial backers, including Donald Trump Jr's investment fund and billionaire Peter Thiel. Recent regulatory shifts under RFK Jr have loosened restrictions on testosterone prescribing, giving the event a surprisingly favorable political tailwind. Critics argue the organisers have a clear conflict of interest, since they also sell the very longevity drugs and peptides they promote.

Get more from every article

Highlight any word or phrase for an explanation or translation, save vocabulary, and bookmark articles.

📚 Key vocabulary

legitimize (verb)
to make something seem acceptable, legal, or officially recognized
"The company tried to legitimize its new practices by publishing an independent audit."
conflict of interest (phrase)
a situation where someone's personal gain could improperly influence their professional decisions
"The board member was asked to step back from the vote due to a clear conflict of interest."
condemn (verb)
to publicly express very strong disapproval of something
"The CEO condemned the leak of confidential client data in an official statement."
autonomy (noun)
the right or ability to make your own decisions without being controlled by others
"Employees perform better when they are given autonomy over how they manage their workload."
regulatory (adj)
related to official rules and the organizations that enforce them
"The new product launch was delayed due to regulatory approval requirements."

✨ Useful phrases for this topic

"under medical supervision"
Use this when describing a risky activity that is monitored and controlled by a qualified professional to make it safer.
"Participants in the clinical trial took the experimental medication only under medical supervision."
"under the guise of"
Use this when something is presented as one thing but is really being used for a different, often questionable, purpose.
"The executives restructured the team under the guise of efficiency, but many saw it as a way to cut salaries."
"conflict of interest"
Use this to flag a situation where someone's personal or financial interests could compromise their objectivity or fairness.
"The consultant disclosed a potential conflict of interest before advising on the merger."

Advanced sentence structures

Patterns from this article you can use in meetings, emails, and everyday English

Structure 1

In context

While this is positive from a harm reduction perspective, it might also increase the numbers of people who use them.

The skeleton

Frame: While [positive claim / concession], [subject] might also [verb phrase with negative or unintended consequence].

What it does: Acknowledges a genuine benefit while warning that it could still cause a problem.

Quick swap: "While flexible working hours are convenient for employees, they might also blur the boundary between work and personal life."

More examples

  • "While labelling calories on restaurant menus is helpful for health-conscious customers, it might also increase anxiety around food for vulnerable diners."
  • "While automating customer service reduces costs for companies, it might also frustrate users who need nuanced human support."
  • "While offering free public transport encourages people to leave their cars at home, it might also overwhelm the network during peak hours."

Easy exercise

Arrange the words and add the missing structural elements to build a correct sentence.

  1. ending the stigma · PED use · positive · increase the number of users · might also
  2. allowing phones in class · helpful for research · distract students · might also
Show answers
  • "While ending the stigma around PED use is positive, it might also increase the number of users."
  • "While allowing phones in class is helpful for research, it might also distract students."

Open exercise

Write your own sentence using this structure. You can write about anything — here are some ideas if you need them:

  • a rule change in professional sport
  • a new workplace policy, such as remote work or flexible hours
  • a government health campaign or public information drive

One possible answer: "While publishing salary ranges in job adverts promotes fairness, it might also cause tension among existing employees who feel underpaid."

Structure 2

In context

In a third argument intended to discredit anti-doping, D'Souza claims athletes in 'regular' sports use PEDs under the guise of Therapeutic Use Exemptions.

The skeleton

Frame: In [a/an] [noun phrase], [subject] + past participle phrase intended to [verb] [object], [main clause].

What it does: Labels someone's stated purpose and signals the speaker's critical distance from it before making the main point.

Quick swap: "In a campaign intended to reassure nervous investors, the CEO announced a new share buyback programme."

More examples

  • "In a move intended to strengthen public trust, the bank published a full breakdown of its executive pay structure."
  • "In a statement intended to calm fears about job losses, the company announced a retraining programme for affected staff."
  • "In a report intended to highlight systemic inequality, the researchers compared promotion rates across different demographic groups."

Easy exercise

Arrange the words and add the missing structural elements to build a correct sentence.

  1. D'Souza · discredit anti-doping · claims · a third argument · athletes already use PEDs
  2. the government · boost consumer confidence · a new tax relief scheme · introduced · reassure households
Show answers
  • "In a third argument intended to discredit anti-doping, D'Souza claims athletes already use PEDs."
  • "In a move intended to reassure households and boost consumer confidence, the government introduced a new tax relief scheme."

Open exercise

Write your own sentence using this structure. You can write about anything — here are some ideas if you need them:

  • a sporting organisation responding to a scandal or controversy
  • a company making a public announcement about a policy change
  • a politician or public figure releasing a statement on a sensitive issue

One possible answer: "In a statement intended to address growing concerns about data privacy, the tech firm announced stricter controls on how user information is shared with third parties."

💬 Discussion questions

1

If an athlete knowingly accepts health risks for fame and money, should society try to stop them — and why?

2

Some people argue that allowing PEDs would actually make sport fairer by ending secret doping. How strong do you think that argument is?

3

In your industry, are there situations where someone promoting a product also profits from selling it — and how do people handle that conflict of interest?