Nearly 40 per cent of people around the world now say they actively avoid the news — and that number is the highest ever recorded. A recent Reuters Institute report found that 69 per cent of Canadians at least occasionally tune out. People describe the feeling as standing under a waterfall of perpetual bad news: overwhelmed, powerless, and exhausted before the day has even started.
As a researcher in developmental psychology, focusing on social development and psychological well-being, I argue that news fatigue is not laziness, weakness or a generational decline in civic interest. It's actually a perfectly logical response from a brain built for a very different world. Our ancestors evolved a negativity bias — a tendency to prioritize threats over good news — because missing a predator could be fatal. That same wiring now processes a war, a financial shock, and a climate disaster all before lunch. A study of over 105,000 news headlines confirmed the pattern: each additional negative word boosted click-through rates, while positive words had the opposite effect.
For some groups, the toll is even heavier. Racialized communities and immigrants face a compounded cognitive load when the news directly targets people like them — and simply switching off is rarely an option when the stories hit close to home.
So what actually helps? Containing news consumption to defined windows of time reduces the sense of being overwhelmed. Choosing one well-reported long-form article beats scrolling through emotionally charged social media posts. And learning to spot "rage bait" — content deliberately designed to provoke rather than inform — creates valuable distance between you and the chaos. The news won't get lighter, but your relationship with it can become far more deliberate.